Abstract:
Subglacial Lake CECs was previously identified using radar profile data. Subglacial Lake CECs lies beneath 2650 m of ice, close to the Ellsworth Mountains at the divide between the Minnesota Glacier and Rutford and Institute Ice Streams in Antarctica. Four seismic reflection profiles were acquired across the lake to determine water column depth and investigate lake bed properties. Shot gathers with 48 channels and a maximum offset of 500 m were recorded. A seismic refraction experiment was undertaken to determine seismic velocities in the firn. Dual frequency and RTK GPS were used to determine shot locations. Seismic surveys indicate a maximum water depth of 301.3 +/- 1.5 m, at the widest part of the lake, with an estimated lake volume of 2.5 +/- 0.3 km3. Imaging of the ice-lake interface indicates topography with slopes of up to 1.9 degrees.
This research was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council, British Antarctic Survey (Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme) and Centro de Estudios Cientificos, Valdivia, Chile.
Keywords:
Antarctica, bathymetry, hydrology, seismic, subglacial lake
Brisbourne, A., Rivera, A., Zamora, R., Napoleoni, F., Smith, A., Ortega, M., & Uribe Parada, J. (2023). Seismic bathymetry surveys of Subglacial Lake CECs, West Antarctica, 2016 and 2022 (Version 1.0) [Data set]. NERC EDS UK Polar Data Centre. https://doi.org/10.5285/768258e0-8719-446f-b20f-587725d55774
| Access Constraints: | No restrictions apply. |
|---|---|
| Use Constraints: | Data supplied under Open Government Licence v3.0 http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/. |
| Creation Date: | 2023-03-28 |
|---|---|
| Dataset Progress: | Complete |
| Dataset Language: | English |
| ISO Topic Categories: |
|
| Parameters: |
|
| Personnel: | |
| Name | UK Polar Data Centre |
| Role(s) | Metadata Author |
| Organisation | British Antarctic Survey |
| Name | Alex Brisbourne |
| Role(s) | Investigator, Technical Contact |
| Organisation | British Antarctic Survey |
| Name | Andres Rivera |
| Role(s) | Investigator |
| Organisation | Universidad de Chile |
| Name | Rodrigo Zamora |
| Role(s) | Investigator |
| Organisation | Centro de Estudios Cientificos |
| Name | Felipe Napoleoni |
| Role(s) | Investigator |
| Organisation | Universidad Austral de Chile |
| Name | Andrew M Smith |
| Role(s) | Investigator |
| Organisation | British Antarctic Survey |
| Name | Marisella Ortega |
| Role(s) | Investigator |
| Organisation | Centro de Estudios Cientificos |
| Name | Jose Andres Uribe Parada |
| Role(s) | Investigator |
| Organisation | Centro de Estudios Cientificos |
| Parent Dataset: | N/A |
| Reference: | Brisbourne, A., Smith, A., Rivera, A., Zamora, R., Napoleoni, F., Uribe, J., & Ortega, M. (2023). Bathymetry and bed conditions of Lago Subglacial CECs, West Antarctica. Journal of Glaciology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.38 Rivera, A., J. Uribe, R. Zamora, and J. Oberreuter (2015), Subglacial Lake CECs: Discovery and in situ survey of a privileged research site in West Antarctica, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3944-3953, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063390 Voigt, D., Peters, L., & Anandakrishnan, S. (2013). Georods: The development of a four-element geophone for improved seismic imaging of glaciers and ice sheets. Annals of Glaciology, 54(64), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.3189/2013AoG64A432 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Quality: | Due to a mis-fire, shot CECD_1440 was repeated with the new shot hole located 3 m offset from the original line towards the CECB line. The time interval between drilling to hole backfilling was only 45 minutes. Similarly, shots CECB_1200 and CECB_1440 repeated as initial shot failed. Loaded and shot on the same day. Seismic Reflection Relative uncertainty in source locations is +/- 50 mm. Relative uncertainty in receiver location is +/- 200 mm. Absolute uncertainty in all positions is +/- 2 m. Uncertainty in shot depth +/- 1 m but can be estimated from the surface ghost. Seismic Refraction Relative uncertainty in locations is +/- 25 mm to 50 m then +/- 200 mm onwards. |
|
| Lineage: | In December 2016, three seismic reflection profiles and a seismic refraction profile were acquired across Subglacial Lake CECs (Lines A/C/D). An additional reflection profile was acquired in January 2022 (Line B). Shot points were surveyed in at 240 m intervals using RTK GPS. Twenty metre deep holes were drilled with a hot water drill. Three 150 g Pentolite boosters, end to end and with two detonators (one detonator for line CECD), were lowered to the base of each hole and then backfilled with snow. Shooting was at least 24 hours after backfill. Acquisition was carried out with two 24 channel Geometrics Geode systems using two 24 channel seismic cables. Four-element 40 Hz Georods were buried in-line with the cable to approximately 40 cm depth with the position measured by the cable takeout spacing. Shooting commenced at higher shot point numbers with the cables spread away towards higher shot point values. The spread had a 30 m offset to the first receiver and 10 m spacing between receivers. After each shot, the shot point was moved 240 m towards lower shot point numbers, one cable pulled past the other cable towards lower shot point numbers and the 24 georods redeployed. Four second record length with 8000 Hz sample rate. In 2016 (Lines A/C/D), to ascertain surface elevation, all three reflection profiles were surveyed by driving a continuously recording dual frequency GPS unit along the profile (antenna mounted in a sledge at surface height). In 2022 (Line B), shot points locations were measured with a dual frequency GPS and receiver locations determined by interpolation (and corrected for 2 m survey pole height). A seismic refraction profile was acquired along Profile A centred around CECA_0500 at W087.4529; S79.2439. The firn profile is assumed laterally homogeneous for this purpose and the shot points moved with receivers remaining in position from CECA_0030 to CECA_0500, except to acquire the closely spaced shots. Three shots were acquired to achieve a maximum offset of 930 m. |
|
| Temporal Coverage: | |
|---|---|
| Start Date | 2016-12-19 |
| End Date | 2016-12-24 |
| Start Date | 2022-01-14 |
| End Date | 2022-01-19 |
| Spatial Coverage: | |
| Latitude | |
| Southernmost | -79.3 |
| Northernmost | -79.2 |
| Longitude | |
| Westernmost | -87.9 |
| Easternmost | -87.4 |
| Altitude | |
| Min Altitude | N/A |
| Max Altitude | N/A |
| Depth | |
| Min Depth | N/A |
| Max Depth | N/A |
| Location: | |
| Location | Antarctica |
| Detailed Location | Subglacial Lake CECs, West Antarctica |
| Sensor(s): |
|
|---|---|
| Data Collection: | Seismic source: 450 g Pentolite in 20 m hot water drill hole, backfilled with snow. Seismic source timing: GPS synchronised trigger. Data logger: 2 x Geometrics Geode 24 ch 24 bit with GPS synchronised trigger. Receivers: 4-element 40 Hz georod sensors on seismic cables with 30 m offset and 10 m spacing. |
| Distribution: | |
|---|---|
| Distribution Media | Online Internet (HTTP) |
| Distribution Size | 804 MB |
| Distribution Format | N/A |
| Fees | N/A |
| Data Storage: | All seismic data are sampled at 8000 sps with 4 second record length. slc_v3_elev_thick.csv Outline of the subglacial lake with surface elevation and ice thickness. Coordinates are Southern Hemisphere polar stereographic coordinates (x,y) with latitude of true scale at 71S. Elevations are relative to WGS84 ellipsoid. slc_shotpoint_info.csv Seismic shot point data and respective SEG2 filename from Geode recorder. Shot point coordinates are given in UTM Zone 16C and Latitude/Longitude with elevations relative to the WGS84 ellipsoid. SEG2-RAW-DATA Seismic reflection profile data - Raw SEG-2 data shot gathers from the Geode recorder for each shot; only the relative header geometry is assigned. Seismic refraction data: Three 48 channel SEG-2 format files direct from Geode; no header geometry assigned. An increasing-spacing spread geometry is used. File 2051.dat: 30 m offset to first receiver and 10 m receiver interval; File 2052.dat: 460 m offset to first receiver and 10 m interval; File 2055.dat: 2.5 m offset to first receiver, 2.5-20 m at 2.5 m interval, 25-50 m at 5 m interval, 50 m onwards at 10 m interval. SEGY-PROFILES Processed seismic reflection profiles used for acoustic impedance analysis with surveyed geometry assigned. Processing includes: geometry assignment, static corrections, normal moveout correction, Kirchoff 2D time migration. RECEIVERS-UTM CECX_rec_gps_utm.csv - for convenience we include the calculated [UTM_X/UTM_Y/Elevation] receiver locations derived from the surveyed GPS data and interpolated between shot points to derive receiver locations. Elevations are relative to the WGS84 ellipsoid. UTM Zone 16C. |